Accessibility

Codes are a Minimum

When we apply the building codes and accessibility standards, it's important to remember that codes establish the minimum acceptable level of safety / accessibility.  The video below is a candid illustration of a door that is code-compliant, but still doesn't provide access for all (if you have trouble with the embedded video, click here to go to the article and video on KOIN.com).

By |2013-09-29T19:11:48-04:00September 13th, 2013|Accessibility|2 Comments

Changes to A156.19 – 2013

A couple of months ago I wrote an article for Doors & Hardware, which appears in the September issue.  As always, I triple-checked my sources, and confirmed that 2007 was the most current edition of A156.19 - American National Standard For Power Assist and Low Energy Power Operated Doors.  Well, today a notification regarding the brand new 2013 edition showed up in my inbox!  Luckily, there are not a lot of changes that would impact the article.

By |2013-09-29T19:13:40-04:00September 2nd, 2013|Accessibility, Automatic Operators|4 Comments

Beautiful Doors of Denver

I'm in Denver for the AIA conference, and this afternoon I played a rousing game of Code Jeopardy with the Denver Chapter of DHI.  If you're at the AIA conference this week, stop at our booth (#530) to play a short version of Code Jeopardy and your name will be entered to win an iPad Mini!  You can enter whether you get the questions right or not, and you'll probably learn something about a new code requirement in the process.

Operational Force for Hardware

The 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, effective in March of 2012, included an unexpected change regarding the maximum allowable force to operate door hardware.  This modification to the standards was made as an "editorial change," which is typically used to address errors or make clarifications that do not affect the scope or application of the code requirements.  Editorial changes do not go through the normal code development process including committee hearings and opportunities for public comment.

By |2019-02-10T10:12:32-05:00March 27th, 2013|Accessibility, Panic Hardware|7 Comments

ICC Code Hearings, Dallas

I realize that not everybody is as excited about new code developments as I am, but some of you might want to take a look or a listen...the code development hearings for the IBC/IFC are going on right now, and discussion on the Means of Egress proposals will be starting soon.  The webcast is very clear and you can get a sense of what it's like to be at the hearings, if you're so inclined.  :-)

By |2013-05-01T19:49:20-04:00May 3rd, 2012|Accessibility, Means of Egress|6 Comments

Closing Speed & Delayed Action

Back in the early 90's when the ADA was the newest focus of the door and hardware industry, delayed action closers were often specified and installed due to the assumption that they were required by the accessibility standards.  Delayed action is a feature available on many door closers, which delays the closing cycle for up to a minute (or more depending on the manufacturer) from the maximum degree of opening to approximately 70 degrees.  The delay is controlled by an additional valve which slows the flow of fluid for that initial period in the closing cycle.  This feature can be helpful in some applications, but it is not required by code.  The other segments of the closing cycle, the main speed and the latch speed, are also controlled by valves (see diagram below).

By |2014-11-03T15:07:01-05:00July 19th, 2011|Accessibility, Door Closers|0 Comments

The Door Closer Fairy Was Here

I have to admit, I visit the local frozen yogurt joint so often that the owners ask me if I want "the usual."  Hey - it's YOGURT...practically health food!  I wasn't sure how I'd be able to make it through their winter break - about 2 months.  I survived, but the closer on their entrance door didn't.  It lost all of its fluid and started looking for fingers to lop off.

By |2014-11-08T11:19:56-05:00March 7th, 2011|Accessibility, Door Closers|13 Comments

Extended Latch Guards

For exterior pairs I prefer to use rim panic devices with a removable mullion, but in some cases surface-mounted vertical rod devices are specified and supplied.  When vertical rod devices are used on cross-corridor doors, I often specify them "Less Bottom Rod" (LBR), but on exterior doors I specify them with both top and bottom latches for increased security.

By |2020-11-21T20:55:10-05:00January 18th, 2011|Accessibility, Panic Hardware|3 Comments

Good News / Bad News

First the good news.  When the annual DHI conference was held in Boston, I conducted a 3-hour code class for architects (I later conducted the class for our DHI chapter.).  Public speaking isn't my favorite thing to do, so when one of the attendees approached me before class started and said, "You're not REALLY going to talk for 3 HOURS about CODES, are you?", I got a little nervous.  When we conduct presentations for architects, they're typically lunch-n-learns - 1 hour max, with lunch (and cookies!) as an incentive to attend.  We get great feedback on our lunch presentations, but asking architects to sit through 3 hours of discussion on hardware and codes was a different story.  To my surprise, about 100 architects registered to attend, they actually showed up, and they stayed until the end.  I didn't lose my train of thought, pass out, have an "accident", or lose my voice, so I considered the class a success.

By |2013-03-01T11:13:52-05:00October 2nd, 2010|Accessibility, Fire Doors, Means of Egress|3 Comments

The Coliseum

You wouldn't think that a fair would be a great place for door-hunting, but I saw the doors below at The Big E last weekend.  There's a lot going on here - sliding, folding, and swinging doors serving a giant assembly occupancy.  This reminds of many scenarios dreamed up by architects that I've advised strongly against.  No offense to all of the architects out there, but I'll bet the facility hates these doors.

By |2016-06-15T11:21:52-04:00September 21st, 2010|Accessibility, Funky Applications, Means of Egress|0 Comments

AccessibilityOnline

AccessibilityOnline is conducting monthly webinars on accessibility as a collaborative training program between the ADA National Network and the US Access Board.  The 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design were recently approved, and the revised standards will be the topic of the next webinar.  The webinar is scheduled for September 2nd, 2010, from 1:30-4:00 ET.  Here's a description of the presentation from their website:

By |2014-11-25T23:23:55-05:00August 9th, 2010|Accessibility|0 Comments

Accessible Thumbturns

At least once a month someone asks me whether it's ok to use a deadbolt with a thumbturn on a door that is required to be accessible.  It took some digging to get a definitive answer, because the accessibility standards don't specify a certain dimension that would be acceptable for the thumbturn.  The ADA guidelines and ICC A117.1 both state that hardware has to be operable without tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist, but that still leaves a lot up to interpretation.

By |2020-02-14T12:09:50-05:00August 5th, 2010|Accessibility, Locks & Keys|5 Comments

Updated ADA Regulations

It's hard to believe that last week was the 20th anniversary of the Americans With Disabilities Act. I clearly remember being sent to a seminar at the Ramada Inn in the early 90's to hear all about how this *new* law would affect architecture and construction. Of course, not much of the presentation was spent discussing the hardware requirements, so our industry was left to figure it out over the years.

By |2021-06-17T17:36:43-04:00August 2nd, 2010|Accessibility|0 Comments

Spring Hinges

After my post about the Parkside West fire, a couple of people have asked me what I have against spring hinges.  I'm not one to discriminate against hardware of any function, style, or finish, but I also like things to do what they're supposed to do.  If I could get my kids to act more like cast iron door closers, I'd be a happy camper.  I'm not picking on spring hinges here - Ives makes spring hinges and is also one of the brands that keeps a roof over my head.  They just need to be used for the right applications.

By |2014-01-08T23:55:59-05:00March 17th, 2010|Accessibility, Hinges & Pivots|8 Comments

<90 Degrees

I haven't posted for a few days because I've been working on my new FDAI presentation and various other things, but I'm kind of excited about this post because it answers a question that has been floating around for years.  Ok...maybe "excited" is the wrong word, but I really enjoy crossing things off the "grey list."

By |2012-01-27T22:08:04-05:00January 14th, 2010|Accessibility, Means of Egress|0 Comments

Lite Location

When I started working in the hardware industry, we regularly supplied doors with a 10" x 10" vision lite (type V in the Steelcraft graphic below), which was typically installed approximately 63" from the center of the lite to the floor.  This configuration would no longer be acceptable according to some current accessibility standards.  The 2003 edition of ICC/ANSI A117.1 states that if a door has a vision lite or an adjacent sidelite which permits viewing, at least one lite in the door or the sidelite has to be located with its bottom edge not more than 43" above the floor.  There is an exception for lites with their bottom edge more than 66" above the floor, which would apply to transom lites or residential entry doors with lites at the top.

By |2017-05-15T09:22:42-04:00November 9th, 2009|Accessibility, Glass|1 Comment

Accessibility by State

Here's a great list of accessibility code requirements and contacts by state.  It lists the accessibility code or standard for each state, as well as the contact information for the state agency that oversees the accessibility requirements.  The list was compiled by the United States Access Board, an independent Federal agency devoted to accessibility for people with disabilities.  There's a wealth of other information on their website, so check it out!

By |2013-09-01T09:09:32-04:00July 22nd, 2009|Accessibility|0 Comments

Clear Opening Width

Back in the 80's, there was a lot of confusion about how to measure the clear opening width of doors. The codes and standards weren't clear, so on doors with panic devices the fire marshals were looking for 32" between the panic device and the stop on the strike jamb.  As each code and standard was revised to include information clarifying this requirement, I would periodically call the State Fire Marshal's office in the state where we most often had the problem. They stopped taking my calls but they eventually changed the way they measured clear opening width.

By |2013-10-18T15:01:33-04:00July 14th, 2009|Accessibility, Means of Egress|4 Comments
Go to Top