Printed from the blog of Lori Greene, AHC/CDC, CCPR, FDAI
Ingersoll Rand Security Technologies
Email: lori_greene@irco.com, Blog: www.idighardware.com or www.ihatehardware.com


Apr 24 2014

Multi-Family Fire Door Safety – The Role of Fire Doors

Category: FDAI,Fire Doors,Life Safety DigestLori @ 12:45 am Comments (0)
Share

This article was published in the Summer 2014 issue of Life Safety Digest, a publication of the Firestop Contractors International Association (FCIA).  You can read this issue online now!

Labels located on the door edge and frame rabbet include important information about the fire door assembly and must remain legible.

Fire door assemblies play a vital role in the protection of life safety, yet many people remain unaware of their existence.  We pass through these doors every day in commercial, institutional, and multi-family residential buildings.  A lack of awareness can lead to modifications or deficiencies which affect the opening protective’s performance when it’s critical – during a fire.

Many codes now require fire and egress door assemblies to be inspected annually, with their condition documented and any noted deficiencies repaired without delay.  But with a little education, building occupants can help to ensure that the fire and egress doors where they live and work are able to perform properly every day.

The first step is to be able to identify which openings are fire door assemblies.  In a multi-family residential building, fire-rated assemblies would typically be found on door openings leading to the stairs, the doors leading from the corridor to each apartment or condominium, and some utility rooms like elevator machine rooms and electrical rooms.  A label from a listing agency such as Underwriters Laboratories or Intertek should be visible on the door edge and the frame rabbet.  On existing openings this label is often painted over, but it is required by code to be legible.

When holding open a fire door, the hold-open device must be listed for that purpose to ensure that the door will be closed if there is a fire.

The role of a fire door is to work with the fire resistance rated wall to provide continuity and compartmentalize a building, inhibiting the spread of smoke, flames, and hot gases.  Fire doors are available in varying levels of protection. For example, a fire door used on a stair enclosure will typically provide 90 minutes of protection, while most corridor doors in a multi-family building are required to provide 20 minutes of protection.  Many fire doors are also egress doors, and therefore must allow free egress for building occupants. Specific codes will dictate the ratings required for each assembly.

In order for a fire door to perform as designed and tested, it must be closed and latched when a fire occurs.  One of the most frequent deficiencies noted during fire door inspections is that the door does not close properly.  Fire doors are typically equipped with door closers or spring hinges. However, doors are often propped open for convenience using wedges, hooks, or other mechanical means.

During a fire, an open door will allow smoke and flames to spread.  Hold-open devices on fire doors must be automatic-closing devices, which allow the door to close upon a signal from the fire alarm system, or an integral smoke detector.  The closing device should reliably close the door until it latches.  Spring hinges used on fire doors will likely need to be adjusted periodically.  NFPA 80, Annex A states that spring hinges should be adjusted to achieve positive latching when allowed to close freely from an open position of 30 degrees.  Many existing fire doors with spring hinges do not reliably close and latch from this position.

This fire door is part of a rated stair enclosure, but it’s missing the active latchbolt that is critical for keeping the fire door closed during a fire.

In a recent fire in a Manhattan high-rise residential building, an electrical fire began in a 20thfloor apartment while the apartment’s resident was not at home.  When he returned home and opened the apartment entry door, he saw the fire and left the building.  The apartment door was not self-closing as required by code, which allowed the smoke and flames to spread.  The smoke filled the corridor, blocking the means of egress for residents of that floor.  When firefighters arrived on the 20th floor and opened the stair door, smoke filled the stair, resulting in several injuries and one fatality.  There have been similar incidents in other multi-family buildings where an apartment fire that would have been minor if contained to the unit of origin spread because of an open door, resulting in fatalities.

The latching requirement for a fire door ensures that the pressure from a fire is not able to push the door open and allow smoke and flames to spread through the opening.  Fire door assemblies may be equipped with locksets or latchsets with an active latchbolt to provide positive latching, or a type of panic hardware called fire exit hardware.  While panic hardware used on non-fire-rated doors includes a mechanical dogging feature which allows the latch to be held retracted, fire exit hardware does not include mechanical dogging.  Fire exit hardware may be provided with electric latch retraction to hold the latch retracted electrically, as long as the latch projects automatically upon a signal from the fire alarm system.  The positive-latching feature on a fire door is often defeated by improper modification of the hardware, or failure to repair latching hardware that has become damaged.

Excess clearance around a fire door will affect smoke infiltration, as well as the performance of the assembly during a fire.

The clearance around a fire door is an important factor for limiting the spread of smoke.  NFPA 80 – Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives, limits the clearance at the head and jambs to 1/8-inch maximum for wood doors and 3/16-inch maximum for hollow metal doors.  For pairs of doors, clearance at the meeting stiles is limited to those same dimensions. And adding meeting stile gasketing is technically not a code-compliant solution to the problem.  The clearance between the bottom of a fire door and the top of the flooring or raised threshold is limited to ¾ of an inch.  There are products which have been tested for use on a fire door with oversized clearance at the bottom, but there are limitations on the door rating, material, and the amount of clearance.  A standard door sweep that has not been specifically tested for use on non-compliant doors where clearance is incorrect should not be used for this application.

The International Building Code (IBC) and NFPA 101 – The Life Safety Code, both require doors in certain locations to have limited air infiltration when tested in accordance with UL 1784 – Air Leakage Tests of Door Assemblies.  Although the codes don’t specifically include a requirement for smoke gasketing, most door openings will not meet the air infiltration requirements without gasketing at the head and jambs.  Refer to the codes for specific requirements, and opening locations which require this testing.  Most smoke and draft control doors are not required to have seals at the door bottom, with the exception of elevator hoistway doors .

When the door closer on this fire door was replaced, the resulting holes should have been filled with steel fasteners or a material that is approved for this use.

Field modification of fire doors is limited by NFPA 80 to preparations for surface-applied hardware, function holes for mortise locks, holes for labeled viewers, installation of protection plates, and a maximum ¾-inch wood and composite door undercutting.  Holes drilled in the field are limited to 1-inch diameter, with the exception of cylinder holes which can be any size.  If holes are left in a fire door assembly when hardware is removed, those holes must be filled with steel fasteners or the same material as the door or frame.  There is also a fire door caulk now available for use in filling small holes in wood doors.  Other modifications should not be made in the field, unless the doors will be reinspected by a labeling agency.

NFPA 80 includes the annual inspection requirements for fire door assemblies – detailed information about the inspection along with 13 criteria which must be verified for each fire door assembly.  NFPA 101 and the International Fire Code (IFC) also contain annual inspection requirements for fire doors and certain egress doors.  These detailed inspections are intended to be conducted by third-party inspectors, and the documentation reviewed by a fire marshal or other code official during their periodic inspection of the building.  Although some code officials may not review the documentation from the fire door inspection, it is the responsibility of building owners and property managers to maintain their fire doors in code-compliant condition.

Failure to keep fire doors in code compliant and operating condition could result in property damage, injury, or even loss of life, and the associated liability that comes along with negligence.  With more focus on the fire doors we use every day, we can improve life safety for all building occupants including those in educational and multifamily structures.


Apr 23 2014

WW: “My door won’t latch.”

Category: Doors & Frames,Wordless WednesdayLori @ 10:57 am Comments (13)
Share

Gary Huizen of Huizen’s Locksmith Service posted this Wordless Wednesday photo on the iDigHardware Facebook page…how many times have you arrived on a jobsite to respond to a closing/latching problem and found something like this?  (Or this?  Or this?)

School Exterior Storage


Apr 22 2014

Guide to the ADA Standards

The US Access Board has added a guide to their website, which explains the ADA standards in detail.  So far, only Chapters 1-3 have been posted, and most of the door-related information is in Chapter 4, but there is a lot of good information relative to the basic ADA requirements.  There are also animations on the site which illustrate wheelchair maneuvering, accessible toilet rooms, maneuvering at doors, and accessible bathing facilities.  There are a few things to note with regard to what has been posted on the site so far, particularly regarding Chapter 3.  The “Common Questions” section includes these 2 questions and answers:

Must operable parts be usable with a closed fist?

Closed-fist operation is a good performance test but is not required by the standards. Many types of operable parts, such as pull handles, satisfy the requirements even though they may not be operable with a closed fist.

Are turn-key locks prohibited by the standards?

Key locks or key cards are not prohibited by the standards which apply only to the fixed portions of operable parts. Similarly, items dispensed by ATMs and fare machines, such as receipts, cash, fare cards, and vending machine products are not covered by the standards.

These answers are the same as the answers I’ve been giving when these questions were asked, but it always helps to have the US Access Board put it in writing.  There isn’t currently a required projection for door pulls, or code language that requires a specific amount of clearance behind the pull to accommodate a closed fist (here’s where I wrote about door pulls).  In the absence of prescriptive code language, some have applied the clearance dimension for handrails (1 1/2 inches) to door pulls.  There’s nothing wrong with that, but it’s not mandatory to have 1 1/2 inches of clearance behind a door pull unless it is a local code requirement.  I have been told by several accessibility experts that there should be enough clearance for a flat hand to slide through, but again, there is no code requirement stating that.

Keys are a tough topic to address, because the accessibility standards mandate operable hardware which does not require tight grasping, tight pinching, or twisting of the wrist to operate.  Keys obviously require tight grasping, tight pinching, and twisting of the wrist, so why are keys acceptable and knobs are not?  As the Access Board’s response states, the standards only apply to fixed portions of the operable parts (they are using “fixed” to mean permanent, not stationary), and keys are not a permanent part of the lock.  A modification may be required – for example, a proximity reader - if a person is unable to operate a keyed lock, but the standard does not prohibit keyed locks in general.

Another interesting item included in the guide is this section on Operation (309.4):

Operation from ADA Guide

My column in the May issue of Doors & Hardware is about the change to the 2010 ADA which requires hardware to be operable with 5 pounds of force.  I was originally told by the Access Board that they recognized there was a conflict between the opening force section (which says the 5-pound opening force does not apply to the force required to release the latch), and the operation section (which says operable parts must not require more than 5 pounds of force to operate).  The person I spoke to from the Access Board back in 2012 said she would recommend removal of the 5-pound requirement for hardware.  However, the guide reinforces the 5-pound requirement by using an illustration of door hardware with the explanation of this section.  If the requirement was going to be removed, the introduction of this guide would have been a good time to make that clear.

Check out the US Access Board Guide to the 2010 ADA Standards by clicking here.  I’ll let you know when the guide to Chapter 4 becomes available.

Meanwhile, let me know if you are running into enforcement of the 5-pound force requirement, or have decided to specify/supply products which operate with a maximum of 5 pounds of force to avoid future ADA issues.


Next Page »


>
Feedback