I recently wrote a post about a change to NFPA 80 related to field-installed glazing in wood fire doors, and Hal Kelton of DOORDATA Solutions pointed out another change to the standard. In both the 2022 and 2025 editions of NFPA 80, Section 6.4.4 is called Locks and Latches. In addition to addressing active latchbolts, dead bolts, and flush bolts, this section covers the labeling of latching hardware.
If you’re not paying close attention, you could miss the change from the 2022 to 2025 edition. The 2022 edition states: Fire exit hardware shall be labeled for both fire and panic. The 2025 edition reads: Fire exit hardware shall be labeled as such.
Being involved in code development myself, I know that code changes – even small ones, are submitted by someone who has a good reason to propose the change. It often takes a fair amount of work to convince the committee that the change is worth making. So I wondered what prompted this change and I spoke to a couple of technical committee members to get some insight.
It seems that there has been some confusion in the field caused by the original wording. Either panic hardware is being installed on fire doors instead of fire exit hardware, or code officials are looking for indications of both panic and fire on the fire exit hardware label.
As most of you probably know, panic hardware must be listed to UL 305 and is installed on non-fire-rated doors. Fire exit hardware is panic hardware that is listed to UL 305 AND UL 10C, and is typically installed on fire doors (but may be installed on non-fire-rated doors, IMO). I don’t see a lot of room for confusion here, but the standard now clearly states the required wording for the label. Seeing “UL” on the label is not enough, because both panic hardware and fire exit hardware have this symbol.
I have to admit, I hadn’t looked closely at a fire exit hardware label lately, at least not close enough to realize that the labels either state panic hardware or fire exit hardware, not both as the original wording in NFPA 80 would suggest. Here is a fire exit hardware label from a while back when it was an actual sticker, and the etched panic hardware label that Von Duprin uses now. I think it’s kind of odd that neither the panic hardware label nor the fire exit hardware label references UL 305.
What do you think about this change to the standard? Will it help to clarify the requirements?
You need to login or register to bookmark/favorite this content.
Simple, and less confusion for Fire marshals & inspectors.
Thanks Glenn! I agree!
– Lori
Why don’t the cover attachment screws match the cover color, Stainless steel as installed at the scalp plate on the mortise lock, rather than zinc plated?
That’s a really good question. Are they always like that? Or did someone use the wrong screws?
– Lori
In my 35 years and responsibility for many hospital buildings, I have encountered panic hardware on a number of fire doors. This problem occurred in older buildings and new buildings. When there was someone from the maintenance, or contracting crew who was present when this mistake was made, after interviewing them I came to the conclusion that regardless of published codes and standards there is a general ignorance of the difference between panic only and fire rated only hardware. Installers often have a number of fire door and panic hardware sets to install, they look interchangeable. They look alike. One difference visually is a means to dog the door open on most panic hardware which I have never seen on fire rated hardware. It seems to me that something intimate to the hardware needs to convey the message. I sat here for an hour trying to think of something cleaver like “FIRE DOORS ONLY! NOT FOR PANIC DOORS” “PANIC DOORS ONLY! NOT FOR FIRE DOORS”. I am, however, reminded of something an OSHA inspector once told me: You can try and make something fool proof, but you cannot make everything damn-fool proof
Hi Jerry!
I’m proud to say that some installers read (and learn from) iDigHardware. I can’t reach them all, but poco a poquito…
– Lori
Just to clarify – “FIRE DOORS ONLY! NOT FOR PANIC DOORS” wouldn’t be correct as fire exit hardware could be used on non-rated doors. The other option “PANIC DOORS ONLY! NOT FOR FIRE DOORS” would make sense but that’s a lot of wording for a small label.
Just when we think something is fool-proof, we are quickly reminded of how hard some people must try to screw it up.
Lori, is Allegion going to change their label to include UL305 on both devices (panic and fire)?
I’m not sure whether the labels will change, but I’ll keep you posted!
– Lori
I know I have struggled getting people to understand in the past so I imagine confusion did occur.
Also I was not a fan of the etched labeling, as I have a CO² and UV laser and could do this on covers, but as someone said to me I could have ordered or made labels in the past just as easy.
That’s a good point Brendan – either type of label could be copied. I’m not sure how to avoid that.
– Lori