Printed from the blog of Lori Greene, AHC/CDC, CCPR, FDAI
Allegion
Email: lori_greene@allegion.com, Blog: www.idighardware.com or www.ihatehardware.com


Oct 04 2018

Decoded: Code Requirements for Hotels and other Residential Occupancies (November 2018)

Here’s my next Decoded article, addressing some of the common code requirements for hotels and other residential occupancies.  This post will be published in the November 2018 issue of Door Security + Safety

.

Many of us travel for business or pleasure, and along the way we may notice door-related code issues in the hotels we pass through. Often, the code requirements for hotels are consistent with other types of residential occupancies such as apartment buildings and dormitories. The International Building Code (IBC) classifies all of these buildings as Residential Group R; hotels are Group R-1 – occupants are mostly transient, and apartment buildings and dormitories are Group R-2 – occupants are mostly permanent/non-transient.

When staying in a hotel it’s very important to report any deficiencies noted, and some hotel chains are particularly open to receiving this feedback. A few years ago I reported a problem fairly late at night when I checked in, and the person responsible for fire and life safety for the entire hotel brand contacted me before I checked out the next morning. I like that kind of attention to safety!

Here’s a summary of some of the basic code requirements that apply to door openings in hotels and other residential occupancies:

  • Exterior Entrances – Generally, all doors that are part of a means of egress must unlatch with one operation (refer to the exception for dwelling/sleeping units below). These doors must also be operable from the egress side without a key, tool, special knowledge or effort, and with no tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist. Releasing hardware must be mounted between 34 inches and 48 inches above the floor (or as required by the state or local jurisdiction). Although the accessibility standards don’t set an opening force limit for exterior doors, the IBC limits the opening force to 15 pounds to release the latch, 30 pounds to set the door in motion, and 15 pounds to open the door to the fully-open position. Some state codes have adopted more stringent opening-force limits for exterior doors. The closing speed for all manually-operated doors on an accessible route must be at least 5 seconds to close the door from an option position of 90 degrees to 12 degrees. Automatic doors must meet the requirements of BHMA A156.19 – Power Assist & Low Energy Power Operated Doors, or BHMA A156.10 – Power Operated Pedestrian Doors.
  • Ballrooms and Other Assembly Spaces – Doors serving assembly occupancies with an occupant load of 50 people or more may not have a lock or latch unless it is panic hardware (or fire exit hardware if the door is fire rated). The requirement for panic hardware applies to all doors in the egress path leading from the assembly space to the public way. Technically, egress doors serving floors with only hotel rooms or apartments are not required to have panic hardware if they are not part of the egress path from an assembly space, although some facilities prefer panic hardware for ease of use and durability.
  • Swimming Pools – Depending on the occupant load of the pool area, many swimming pool enclosures require panic hardware on the egress doors serving the space. Most swimming pool enclosures are also required to limit access to prevent unaccompanied children from accessing the swimming pool. This requires doors and gates to either be self-closing, self-latching, and automatically locked on the access side, or for access hardware to be mounted at 54 inches above the floor or ground.
  • Stairwell Doors – It’s not uncommon to see stairwell doors that do not close and latch properly in hotels and apartment buildings. In most cases, these doors are required to be fire door assemblies, so the doors must close and latch to protect the means of egress. NFPA 80 – Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives, also requires limited clearance around the door, and hardware and glazing that is listed for use as part of a fire door assembly. When stair doors are lockable on the stair side to prevent access from one floor to another, the doors are required to unlock if a fire occurs, to allow building occupants to leave the stair if it becomes compromised by smoke.
  • Dwelling Units and Sleeping Units – Doors leading from interior corridors to these units are typically required to have a 20-minute fire rating, which means that they are designed and tested to deter the spread of smoke and flames for at least 20 minutes. These doors are required to close and latch reliably, and to meet all of the requirements of NFPA 80. Although spring hinges are not prohibited, they may not close the door reliably over time, and may need frequent adjustment. Excessive clearance is a common problem with unit entrance doors, as well as damaged or missing gasketing. While past codes may not have required gasketing, the IBC requires corridor doors to have limited airflow, and perimeter gasketing is usually required to minimize the airflow to the required level. In most jurisdictions, entrance doors to units with an occupant load of 10 people or less are allowed to have a deadbolt or other security device in addition to the latching hardware, as long as the security device does not require a key or tool to operate from the egress side.
  • Communicating Doors – When two hotel rooms are connected by a door opening, a communicating door is typically used.  This is actually two doors swinging in opposite directions, installed in the same frame.  The assembly is required to be fire rated, in order to maintain the fire separation between the rooms when the rooms are occupied by two different parties.  When both adjoining rooms are rented by the same group – for example, a family – the fire separation between the rooms is not required.  Because of this, there is an exception that allows the door closers to be omitted from these doors, even though fire doors are typically required to be self-closing or automatic-closing.  Communicating doors are required to have positive-latching hardware, so a latchset or exit lock is typically provided on each door leaf along with a deadbolt with a thumbturn on the room side.
  • Service Rooms and Areas – Doors serving rooms and corridors used by staff, including storage areas, may have been modified for convenience or may become damaged due to cart traffic or abuse. It’s critical to maintain these doors in code-compliant condition; many of them are fire door assemblies, egress doors, and/or located on an accessible route. The egress path must be kept clear of stored materials, so the means of egress can be used by building occupants during an emergency.
  • Inspections and Maintenance – The fire codes adopted in most US states require fire door assemblies to be maintained in accordance with NFPA 80. Since the 2007 edition of this standard, NFPA 80 has required fire door assemblies to be inspected annually, as part of the maintenance procedures. Even if a jurisdiction is not enforcing the inspection requirements, it is still the responsibility of the building owner or property manager to ensure that all of the fire door assemblies are in code-compliant condition; any damaged components or deficiencies must be repaired without delay.

Because a good portion of the building occupants’ time in a residential occupancy is spent sleeping, and because some transient occupants may not be familiar with the egress routes, it’s crucial for doors to be in working order so they will function properly during an emergency. Most doors are required for egress and must meet the applicable egress requirements. Many doors in residential occupancies are also required to be fire door assemblies to help slow the spread of fire and protect the egress paths. In addition, the accessibility standards typically apply to common area doors and unit entry doors, as well as the doors within some of the units. Complying with all of these requirements may seem difficult, but this compliance helps to ensure the safety of all guests and residents.

Photo:  shutterstock/August_0802

You need to login or register to bookmark/favorite this content.

Recent Posts

14 Responses to “Decoded: Code Requirements for Hotels and other Residential Occupancies (November 2018)”

  1. Dave Snell, AHC says:

    Could you expand on this and describe the communicating doors. I understand they have to be Fire Rated but do not have to be self closing.

    • Lori says:

      Good point! I will add a section on that.

      – Lori

      • Randy says:

        My understanding is that just 1 door needs to be rated along with the frame, correct?

        • Lori says:

          Hi Randy –

          That depends on who you ask. I would rather see both doors rated because a) what if the rated door is opened by the tenants, leaving the opening not protected even though the non-rated door is closed, and b) the price differential is not worth the risk. In a test condition, 1 rated door would be sufficient, because both doors are closed during the test. But there is no guarantee that’s how it will be during an actual fire.

          – Lori

  2. Karl Pfeffer says:

    Hi Lori. I am still fuzzy on an issue with panic hardware. I understand that rooms that are group A occupancy with 50 or more people need panic hardware. You noted that “The requirement for panic hardware applies to all doors in the egress path leading from the assembly space to the public way.” This may make sense but the building code does not directly state this. The building code says: “1008.1.10 Panic and fire exit hardware. Doors serving a Group H occupancy and doors serving rooms or spaces with an occupant load of 50 or more in a Group A or E occupancy shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware or fire exit hardware.” So if you have a mixed-use building like an office building (B occupancy with a meeting room that has over 50 occupants, the meeting room would need panic hardware since it would be an A occupancy. Once a person leaves the meeting room and enters the rest of the building they are in the B occupancy and panic hardware is not required in a B occupancy. Do you know of any official interpretation that would address this issue? Thanks, Karl.

    • Lori says:

      Hi Karl –

      Panic hardware is required for the doors within the means of egress (i.e. “doors serving rooms or spaces…”) – not just the first door in the means of egress, but the whole egress path. This is not true of electrical rooms with panic hardware, but with the large meeting room you referenced, the doors serving that room would include the meeting room door, any cross-corridor or stair doors that you would pass through while exiting, as well as the exterior and vestibule doors. All of those would require panic hardware if they have a lock or latch.

      The IBC Commentary says: Doors that are part of a means of egress from the locations listed in this section shall not be provided with a latch or lock other than panic hardware or fire exit hardware unless one of the two exceptions is met. For all doors that provide means of egress for
      rooms and spaces of assembly and educational (Group A and E) occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more, if latching (or locking) hardware is installed, it must be panic hardware or fire exit hardware. This would include large assembly spaces in mixed-use buildings.

      It’s not completely clear in the Commentary, I guess, but what would be the point of releasing 500 people from a ballroom through doors with panic hardware if they can’t continue along the egress path through doors with panic hardware?

      – Lori

      • Karl Pfeffer says:

        Thanks Lori. I agree that it makes sense to provide all doors along the path of egress with panic hardware. To me it is not very clear based on how the code is written.

        • Lori says:

          It’s all based on the premise that the doors serving a particular area are all of the doors between the space and the public way. It goes back to the definition of the means of egress and the 3 parts – exit access, exit, and exit discharge.

          – Lori

  3. Paul Stockert says:

    In an ICC publication entitled “2009 IBC Questions and Answers” (which is out of print), a similar question is asked and the ICC staff opinion is:

    Question: When a panic bar is required on the egress door from an electrical room, must every sub sequent door outside this electrical room leading to an exit discharge have panic hardware as well? The code doesn’t state that every door thereafter must be equipped with a panic device. I’d argue, no, because once the electrical room is evacuated, the safety risk has been reduced. Furthermore, panic devices are otherwise only required when the conditions of an A, E and some H occupancies with loads greater than 50 are present.

    Answer: There are two different circumstances where panic hardware is required. These requirements are expressed in two different paragraphs of
    Section 1008.1 .10. The first indicates that each room or space classified as a Group A or E occupancy with an occupant load of 50 be provided with panic hard ware. For these occupancies, the code requires each door in the egress path of travel to have panic hard ware. The second requirement is specific to electrical rooms. This requirement only applies to electrical rooms and does not apply to the rest of the path of
    egress travel. [10-54]

  4. Kevin says:

    Nice Job Lori! Keep up the GREAT job of keeping us trained!!

  5. Adam Miceli says:

    I may be a little confused, but would it not be possible to have a meeting room of over 50 occupants that would not require the doors be fire rated? Thus, the doors may not be required to have any latching mechanism? This explains the “shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware or fire exit hardware”? If this is possible, then is there another number for aggregate total occupants before the rest of the doors within a MOE are required to be panic/fire exit hardware? Of maybe this is a case where IBC/BOCA is more stringent than NFPA (allows up to OL=100 before panic/fire exit hardware).

    • Lori says:

      Hi Adam –

      Yes, you could have a meeting room with >50 occupants that does not have fire door assemblies, so the meeting-room doors could have push/pull hardware and would not require panic hardware if there was no need to lock them. BUT…let’s say you have a meeting room with an occupant load of 50, and the meeting-room doors don’t need to be lockable but the exterior doors further on down the means of egress do need to lock. The exterior doors, as well as any cross-corridor doors or stair doors that someone would pass through on their way out of the meeting room, would need panic hardware if they had a lock or latch. And yes, the IBC is more stringent than NFPA 101 – panics for 50 occupants in Assembly/Educational, where 101 requires panics for those occupancies with a load of 100.

      – Lori

Leave a Reply



This website or its third party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. If you want to know more or withdraw your consent to all or some of the cookies, please refer to the cookie policy. By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies.

This website or its third party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. If you want to know more or withdraw your consent to all or some of the cookies, please refer to the cookie policy. By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies.