In 2025, BHMA published a new standard to establish methods for defining levels of acoustic performance of door hardware. The article linked in today’s post goes into more detail…
Comments: 0
If one set of doors was lockable and the other was always unlocked (not lockable), I think this could be considered a dead end corridor. How would you have specified the hardware for these doors?
Comments: 3
In this Decoded article, I took a closer look at the requirements related to fire protection systems for doors with electrified hardware.
Comments: 2
I was recently reading a case study from TGP about a new secondary school project in Vancouver, BC, and it got me thinking about the buildings where I attended junior high and high school.
Comments: 1
I spent this week in Indianapolis, where I felt temperatures unlike any that I can remember experiencing in at least 25 years. Check out some of the doors I found on my trip in today’s post.
Comments: 4
Here’s Part 2 of my post from Tuesday, addressing changes to the 2027 edition of the IBC permitting a second releasing motion for egress in certain types of rooms.
While today’s Wordless Wednesday modification solved a fire door issue, it created a tripping hazard. I would have specified this a little differently…how about you?
Comments: 16
While this upcoming change does not apply until the 2027 edition of the International Building Code (IBC) is adopted in a project’s jurisdiction, it’s a good one to be aware of.
Today’s post is the final wrap-up for our series on the fire door assembly inspection criteria. If you missed any posts or you want to learn more, here’s where you’ll find that info!