Printed from the blog of Lori Greene, AHC/CDC, CCPR, FDAI
Allegion
Email: lori_greene@allegion.com, Blog: www.idighardware.com or www.ihatehardware.com


Mar 22 2017

WW: Blinds

Category: Egress,Wordless WednesdayLori @ 12:13 am Comments (7)
Share

A fire marshal sent me this photo, and I’m Wordless (again).  How does anyone think this is acceptable???


Mar 21 2017

Training Alert: Codes & Door Hardware for Accessible Openings

Category: AccessibilityLori @ 12:24 am Comments (1)
Share

On Thursday, March 30th, there will be two opportunities to earn AIA continuing education credits and learn about an important code-related topic.  My coworker, David Glorioso, will be conducting a webinar to discuss codes and regulations that apply to accessible openings. He will cover opening requirements and how to choose door hardware to ensure compliant openings.

David has been a specialist in the hardware industry since 1986 and a specification writer since 2001.  His background includes extensive experience in commercial door hardware, and he was the hardware specifier for the Palladium – a project that I wrote about a while back.

The webinars will be held from 10-11 a.m. and 2-3 p.m. Eastern.  If you’d like to register for either of these time slots, click the links below.

Thursday, March 30th, 10-11 a.m. Eastern

Thursday, March 30th, 2-3 p.m. Eastern


Mar 20 2017

QQ: Accessible Mounting Height

Category: Accessibility,Push/Pull,Quick QuestionLori @ 12:00 am Comments (2)
Share

Most of you know that hardware used to operate a door on an accessible route must be mounted between 34 inches and 48 inches above the floor.  In California, the allowable range is 34 inches to 44 inches.  But does the ENTIRE piece of hardware have to be mounted within that area?

As with many issues related to hardware, this is not specifically addressed in the codes and standards – which means that the final determination would be made by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ).  But let’s look at this from a common-sense standpoint.

For some types of hardware – like lever handles, touchpads and crossbars on panic hardware, and extended-length thumbturns – the portion of the hardware used to retract the latch must be mounted within the allowable range.  I think the intent is pretty clear for these products, but the question has come up a lot lately with regard to two other types of hardware:

  1. Long Door Pulls – According to the Door & Hardware Institute’s document – Recommended Locations for Architectural Hardware, the standard location for the center of a door pull is 42 inches above the floor.  If a 10-inch-high pull is mounted at this height, the entire pull will be in the area between 34 inches and 48 inches above the floor.  But many pulls used today are longer – even “full-height”.  In my opinion, the intent of the codes and standards is that a usable portion of the pull would need to fall into the allowable range – not the entire pull.  An AHJ may disagree with me (fair warning), but I think having enough of the pull for someone to use at the accessible height meets the intent.  How much of the pull needs to be “in the zone”?  Again, this would be up to the AHJ but depending on the design of the pull it seems like 4-6 inches would be sufficient.  Remember – this is my interpretation based on experience, since there is no prescriptive language in the codes and standards to address this.
  2. Keypads, Push Buttons, and Other Access Control/Security Components – This is a tough one, and I can’t make an official determination.  Some would argue that a push button on an electrified lock for access control is exempt from the mounting height requirements because of the International Building Code (IBC) exception stating:  “Locks used only for security purposes and not used for normal operation are permitted at any height.”  The ADA also has an exception to the mounting height IF the door is designed to be operated only be security personnel – an advisory reiterates that security personnel must have sole control of doors that are eligible for this exception.  Many of these access control components are used on a regular basis by people who are not security personnel, which would mean that if the component is considered operable hardware, it would have to be mounted within the allowable range.  This can be especially difficult given the California limitation.  Again – this would be up to the AHJ since it is not specifically addressed in the codes and standards, but it’s definitely something to watch out for.

.

If you have run into this question and received a directive from the AHJ, I’d love to hear about it!


« Previous PageNext Page »